Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Rebellion in Seagrove- What's at Stake

There is a potter rebellion against the Museum of N.C. Traditional Pottery, and a desire to stage a seperate festival the same weekend as the Seagrove Pottery Festival. Refer to Southern Pines The Pilot staff writer John Chappell's "Potters Rebel on Festival" article as well as a statement of intent or resolution that has been published in area newspapers as a "letter to the editor".

The public should be aware that immediately following the death of Seagrove Pottery Festival founder Richard Gillson, an attempt was made to transfer control of the 26 year old festival and bankrupt the Museum through the efforts of a high ranking Randolph County employee. That particular effort failed.

Seagrove potter and Museum supporter Phil Morgan may be accurate in his determination that plans for a private festival is a power play that appears to be a hostile takeover of the Seagrove Pottery Festival. Many Museum supporters are not willing to rebel against an organization that continues to support them economically and provide a lucrative sales event.

The Seagrove Pottery Festival, named as a Southeast Tourism Society Top 20 Event for the second year in a row, is a financial bonanza for many area potters, and it is unfortunate that some potters do not understand the issues and the risks associated with the destruction of a Top 20 sales event.

According to Chappell's article, potter Ben Owen stated that the Seagrove Pottery Festival should have always been his group's festival.

The festival is owned and operated by the Museum according to it's non-profit charter. The Museum uses festival proceeds to maintain a free information facility that continues to promote local potters throughtout the entire year.

The downtown Seagrove Museum showcases local pottery, distributes maps and educates the public about the scores of shops in the area while helping them plan their visits. Most simply stated, a large portion of Seagrove Pottery Festival proceeds are invested back into the Seagrove pottery community, and the Museum supports and represents all Seagrove area potters in a fair and equitable manner.

A second festival will harm attendance at the Seagrove Pottery Festival and may cause financial harm to the Museum. It could also cause a negative impact on the ecomonic vitality of less fortunate potters within the Seagrove area.

A rebellion does not appear to be a wise or intelligent solution to economic challenges that face the Seagrove area. Seagrove potters who would prefer to simply make pots should take interest in such a rebellion, expecially one that could seriously affect their business of selling those pots.